EDITED TO ADD: all feed and cargo nicely as a result of my push, other than that S&B are sometimes extremely not easy to seat. The only real dud primer I've at any time had was an S&B LP. I think it had been missing an anvil. Get appears to have the loosest QC on cup shape and height.
Incorporate to estimate Only display this user #6 · Might 29, 2010 Many of us choose to use Federal primers of their DA revolvers. I see they seat easier than CCI when applying my RCBS hand priming Software, but I have not recognized Significantly variance in speed or accuracy among The 2 and interchange them based on availability with no transforming my load recipe.
But he purchases any primers he can when he can make his gun shop rounds, which can be continuously considering that he’s retired.
That was the one firearm I ever had that difficulty with. In range capturing, my buddy could load the miss fired rounds into his 380 and every one fired. Traded it off.
Then Winchester S&B and Rem. Way down about the list is Federal. They're good primers, but I don't have handguns that need softies. So their packaging is exactly what retains me from acquiring much more if I've a alternative.
Whatsoever - don't substitute magnum pistol primers for traditional ones inside your handgun masses and gently seat primers.
Just curious,possibly if I can discover some 210s I'll test a comparison Together with the CCI 200s or perhaps all three. I'd recommend you make your "Safety Notice" much better or delete your summary Primarily given that There are plenty of latest/inexperienced loaders reading these posts.
About 3/4 of my readily available are CCI, and a lot of the relaxation are Fed. I are actually working with LP and SP Fed these days to clear some Area. I may match with a lot of the Fed match LR primers in the future to find out if they tighten teams.
Up coming I obtained the Ginex primers at all around $a hundred a brick. I found these primers hard to seat flush (Of course all primer seats while in the shells have been cleaned out.
It will not make sense to me that Federal would make a rather diverse sized primer/primer pocket on objective. I'm not a manufacturing engineer, but I am unable to imagine that doing so would help save them ample revenue to justify the cost.
And we're headed into a "credit score crunch" of tight credit, meaning It is tough to get loans for operating costs or capital investments.
It is no secret , the war in Ukraine is gobbling up ammo in the least scales as quick as it could be developed. The Russians are Doing the job as difficult as they're able to to maintain up, and China and Nort Korea are helping as much as possible. With time, the US Govt. shut down the vast majority of arsenal potential for ammunition, sourcing the primary difference from professional sources within the US and NATO sources.
I would assume them to have a little bit tighter grouping and velocity variation, but browse of parents that have skilled the other.
Incorporate to quotation Only demonstrate this consumer #five · Jan four, 2011 What Gunhacker reported is true. Usually switching primer makes is alright, but some primers are hotter which may be a difficulty If the load is around optimum. In the event the reloading materials ended up scarce number of several years back again I used to be working up a load for my 375 H&H. I couldn't obtain Federal primers which the guide used, but I had Winchester brand name. I known as Hodgdon as well federal no 210 large rifle primers as tech claimed no problem and actually many reloaders have discovered precision greater With all the 375 H&H when Winchester brand primers were being utilised.